The recent “Enhancing Peer Review” self-study process at NIH led to, among other things, the introduction of bulleted critiques and overall impact scores. A recurring theme in feedback to the agency was the desire for more information about the impact scores.
In light of this, reviewers have been asked to write a paragraph summarizing the factors that informed their overall impact score to supplement the bulleted critiques. This paragraph is included in the summary statements.
Another new initiative is a continuous review of the peer review process. You can see a report on the first round of surveys on the OER website.
For more information about NIH Extramural Research, please visit their Extramural Nexus page.
--------------
View all NIH-related posts from Research Newsletter
In light of this, reviewers have been asked to write a paragraph summarizing the factors that informed their overall impact score to supplement the bulleted critiques. This paragraph is included in the summary statements.
Another new initiative is a continuous review of the peer review process. You can see a report on the first round of surveys on the OER website.
For more information about NIH Extramural Research, please visit their Extramural Nexus page.
--------------
View all NIH-related posts from Research Newsletter
No comments:
Post a Comment