Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute Opportunities

The new Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute — an independent, nonprofit, non-governmental institute funded by the Affordable Care Act of 2010 — is committed to a rigorous, stakeholder-driven process that emphasizes patient engagement.

There are two ways to become involved immediately:

Apply for PCORI Pilot Project Grants, which have a threefold purpose:

• First, to assist PCORI with ongoing development of national research priorities for patient-centered outcomes research. Applicants will be expected to establish the significance of the proposed research and build a case for why it should be considered a guiding question for research agenda setting strategies that can be used in future comparative effectiveness research. 
• Second, the program will support the collection of preliminary data that can be used to advance the field of patient-centered outcomes research. 
• And third, PCORI seeks methodologies that can be used to advance patient-centered outcomes research and identify gaps where methodological research needs further development.

Letters of intent are required by November 1, 2011 and invited proposals are due by December 1, 2011.

Become a reviewer for the PCORI Pilot Project Grant Program. PCORI executive director Joe Selby says “the program is looking for patients, scientists, and other stakeholders who are not usually represented in scientific review groups to serve as reviewers of the pilot projects grants applications.” The institute is particularly interested in individuals who have interest in or experience with one or more of the eight areas of interest outlined in the pilot projects grants program announcement. Reviewer applications are due by October 26, 2011.

Contact your department or unit's Proposal Manager for more information.

Virginia B. Ball Center for Creative Inquiry now accepting Fellowship applications

The Virginia B. Ball Center for Creative Inquiry enables faculty and students to

• Explore the connections among the arts, humanities, sciences and technology 
• Create a product to illustrate their collaborative research and interdisciplinary study, and 
• Present their product to the community in a public forum. 

Each year, four Ball State University faculty members are selected (through an open competition) to teach an interdisciplinary seminar to fifteen students—similar to a capstone experience for majors or an honors colloquium.

All applications are due Friday, January 20, 2012 at the Virginia Ball Center (at Kitselman) by 4:00 p.m.

 Click here to download an application (PDF) to apply for a fellowship.

View the 2011-2012 Academic Year Press Release to read about the upcoming seminars.

The VBC will host a Forum for potential fellowship applicants on Tuesday, October 25th, from 4:00-5:30 p.m. at Kitselman. Director Joe Trimmer, and former and current Fellows will be available to answer questions. Joe is currently scheduling individual conferences with faculty who wish to plan, draft, and revise applications.

Application forms for 2012-2013 Fellowships are available. Please see your Dean or Department Chair about these forms, call Donna Ferguson 287-0117 to request a copy or print a copy of the form from the Center's website at http://www.bsu.edu/vbc (see Documents.) 

All new... SPO Facebook!

The Sponsored Programs Office is pleased to unveil our all new Facebook page! "LIKE" the Sponsored Programs Office at Ball State University page to stay up to date with news, proposal development articles, workshop information, tips and tricks to finding funding, office news, and so much more!

What are you waiting for? 

Need more SPO social media? Follow us on Twitter!

@BSU_SPO

From {Centered}: Proposal rejected? Don't despair.

Even experienced grantseekers get turned down more often than they'd like. But how you handle those disappointments will affect how successful you are in the long run. Rebecca Shawver offers good advice on dealing with grant rejection in "It's Time to Remember that 'No' Doesn't Always Mean 'Never'" (CharityChannel, August 17, 2011). It's crucial, says Shawver, to speak with the funder after your request has been denied to learn the reasons for their decision. Different reasons require different remedies. For instance:

The funder liked your project, but they didn't have enough money.

• Begin planning earlier next time.
• Find out whether collaborating with other groups might increase your chances of success in the future.
• Adopt any recommendations the grantmaker may make in your post-rejection conversation.

The funder doesn't know you very well.

• Meet with them personally.
• Invite them to visit your offices and program sites.

You didn't demonstrate community support in your request.

• Before reapplying gather more letters of support and go after more matching funds and in-kind support.

Your program--or your description of it--needs to be better developed.

• Refine your proposal to include components that describe your program more effectively.
• Make sure your program reflects the latest trends and incorporates the best practices in the field.

The funder's "No" really did mean "Never."

• Look to other sources of funding, there are other fish in the sea!  

Article from The Grantsmanship Center {Centered} October 2011 issue.

From IAC ArtsEye: The Individual Artist Program Grant from a Past Recipient's Point of View

In light of the Individual Artist Program (IAP) grant opening on November 1st, we thought it'd be a good idea to catch up with one of our past IAP recipients. This month, we're speaking with Daren Pitts Redman, a fiber artist from Brown County and a FY11 IAP grant recipient in crafts.

Daren used her grant to create a body of work using fabric manipulated with the arashi shibori technique. The fabric was then used to create a 3D interactive art installation at Wonderlab in Bloomington, Indiana. Viewers are able to touch and reshape the installation to create their own artistic composition.

Indiana Arts Commission (IAC): Tell us a little bit about your work as an artist.

Daren Pitts Redman (DPR): I hand dye cottons in solid colors and by using the traditional Japanese tie and die technique, shibori. I use my photographs as inspiration for abstract quilted wall hangings.

IAC: Why did you apply for a grant in FY2011?

DPR: This is a way to challenge myself to create a new body of work. It gets finished and viewed by the public. The process allows me to design and create my art while coordinating an exhibit with curators and gallery directors that might not be possible without the IAP grant.

IAC: You have received more than one IAP grant, what made you apply often?

DPR: I enjoyed the process and creative time so much when I made the 3 large quilts series based on what I saw at the Eiteljorg Museum. Two summers ago, I took a 3D textile class through the Split Rock Arts Program at the University of Minnesota and wanted to use my new skills to make an installation. This was a way for me to present an exhibit in my community.

New Jr. Faculty Workshop Incentive Program

Grant Writing Essentials is a five-part workshop series led by Sponsored Programs Office (SPO) Program Manager Stanley Geidel. In order to increase the number of Junior Faculty Members educated in grant writing and to further increase the number of quality external grant submissions, SPO is pleased to offer an incentive to Junior Faculty Members who attend these workshops.

Junior Faculty members who attend Parts 1 - 4 of the Grant Writing Essentials workshops are eligible to receive $250 in their Researcher Incentive Account (RIA) for extramural expenses. Further, an additional $250 will be made available to Junior Faculty members who submit an external grant proposal within 18 months of attending the series.

Eligibility

• Junior Faculty members in their first, second, or third year of receiving a new appointment (tenure‐track or full‐time contract).
• Those faculty moving from contract to tenure‐track status are considered eligible as junior faculty, again, in their first three years of receiving a tenure‐track position.

Workshop Schedule
All workshops are held from 12:00-1:00 pm in BL 215 (Bracken Library)

1. Developing a Fundable Idea - Focuses on how to transform ideas for grant proposals into fundable propositions.
   October 6, 2011 or January 12, 2012
2. Writing the Proposal Narrative - Detailed guidance for developing proposal content as well as how to present the grant narrative for maximum effectiveness.
   October 20, 2011 or January 26, 2012
3. Project Evaluation - SPO has teamed up with SSRC to offer attendees the information and resources they need to develop a strong evaluation plan for their grant project.
   November 3, 2011 or February 9, 2012
4. Budget Development - This workshop outlines a straight-forward approach on how to construct a grant budget.
   November 17, 2011 or February 23, 2012

Application Process
There is no formal proposal required for this incentive. Instead, please do the following:

• Register for Parts 1 - 4 of the Grant Writing Essentials workshop sessions online at the Learning and Development website. 
• Sign the attendance sheet during each workshop session.
• Upon completion of the 4 workshops, submit a Workshop Incentive Application detailing dates attended and targeted external grant submission to aspire@bsu.edu

Additional program information can be found at the Essentials Incentive Program page.

Teaching Students to Search with ‘Google Search Education Evangelism’

From The Chronicle of Higher Education - Prof. Hacker Blog:

On Wednesday I asked an open thread discussion question–How do we measure (and improve) students’ digital skills?–that resulted in a pretty good conversation about various approaches different people take.

I think it becomes clear in any such conversation that we’re really talking about at least two different sets of skills: information literacy (how to find, evaluate, and use information), and digital proficiency (how to use various software applications, how to problem solve, how to adapt to unfamiliar environments).

With regard to information literacy, it’s often a challenge (in my experience) not only to get students to search using something other than Google; it’s also difficult to teach them how to use Google effectively. And in this way my students seem similar to the students in the ERIAL study discussed by the Inside Higher Ed article I referenced in Wednesday’s post: “They were basically clueless about the logic underlying how the search engine organizes and displays its results. Consequently, the students did not know how to build a search that would return good sources.”

Well, thanks to a recent Tweet by Micah Vandergraft, I now know of a site designed to address search skills: Google’s “Search Education Evangelism” site. While the name may be a bit strange (or maybe that’s just me), the content of the site looks to be quite useful, including

• Lesson plans, from basic to advanced,
• Slide decks, available for use by instructors, and
• Recorded webinars, available for download.

Original article and more from Prof. Hacker can be found by clicking here.

From GRC GrantWeek: New AREA Program Director Shares News, Advice

Erika Brown, the dynamic new director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) program, met with attendees at the GRC 2011 External Funding Conference on August 23, 2011.

Historically, the AREA program has been overseen by an NIH-designated coordinator, with leadership turning over every couple of years. With the establishment of the program director position, NIH has acknowledged the importance of AREA in the agency’s overall research portfolio. Backing NIH’s goal to broaden its applicant pool, AREA, or R15, awards support small-scale biomedical and behavioral research projects conducted by faculty and students at colleges and universities that have not been major recipients of NIH grant funds.

Brown intends to rewrite the AREA program announcement to include a game-changing new feature. Currently, all types of NIH grant proposals, including AREA requests, are reviewed together in regular study sections. With the new program announcement, NIH will begin clustering AREA grant proposals separately within study section reviews.

The success rate for AREA proposals is less than one in five under the existing review system. Brown provides this advice for developing more competitive, error-free proposals:

• Describe the special institutional characteristics that make the request appropriate for the AREA program, and provide a profile of current and former students, focusing on the number who go on to advanced degrees (this should be submitted in the “Facilities and Other Resources” section of the application).
• Describe how the project will expose students to research, and how the NIH support will strengthen the research environment on your campus.
• Include the total budget in budget period one. Unlike most NIH grants, AREA funding for all years, the entire grant term, is awarded up-front at the project start date.
• Use a modular budget if your total budget is $250,000 or less. If larger budget is proposed, use the R&R Detailed Budget form.
• Find an NIH institute or center that could support your area of research, make contact in advance, and then include a cover letter with the application to suggest an appropriate institute and up to three appropriate study sections.

The next AREA deadline is set for October 25, 2011. Annual deadlines include February 25, June 25, and October 25. Full guidelines can be found: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-10-070.html

Invitation to submit proposals: Provost Immersive Learning Initiative 2012-2013

The Provost Immersive Learning Grant can be used to fund an entire immersive learning project, equipment, some travel, as well as buyouts to ensure you have time to commit to the project.

Please click here for guidelines.

All copies are due to the Provost's Office by 5:00p.m., Monday, October 3, 2011.

The proposals are judged on your expertise, time commitment, budget requests, etc., as well as the seven criteria of immersive learning:

• carry academic credit
• engage participants in an active learning process that is student-driven but guided by a faculty mentor
• produce a tangible outcome or product
• involve at least one team of students, often working on a project that is interdisciplinary in nature
• include community partners and create an impact on the larger community as well as on the student participants
• focus on student learning outcomes
• help students define a career path or make connections to a profession or industry

Open Information Sessions
Two open Forums have been scheduled:

1. Tuesday, September 13, 4:00p.m. Student Center Rm. 305
2. Wednesday, September 21, 4:00p.m. Student Center Rm. 305

See some of the projects that have been funded.

Invitation to Submit Proposals: Discovery 2012-2013

The Discovery group invites the submission of project proposals for funding in 2012. Discovery funds projects that further the mission of the university as expressed in the 2007 – 2012 Strategic Plan.  Group members are interested in projects that significantly impact Ball State students, offer immersive learning opportunities, and have potential for other external funding in the future.

Proposals must be turned into the Sponsored Programs Office by October 3, 2011.

Please click here for guidelines.

About Discovery
Discovery is a women’s collaborative philanthropic group established to support projects and programs at Ball State University. Discovery members are interested in projects that significantly impact Ball State students, offer immersive learning opportunities, and have potential for other external funding in the future.

For more information about the Discovery awards, visit the Discovery Awards 2011 page.